297
however, thet in practice, the necessary "huchso" vra
The Polish Government
presented by the Chinese Miniater.
stated that they were prepared to adopt the same attitude
o His jonty'a Government provided that the other eras
exporting countries ect similarly and that, as all folish
arms factories are stato-oraod, they would be in a position
effectively to implement their undertakingə
Since no
appreciable exports of me from Poland to Chine took place
in the year 1983, His 'Tejesty's Government are disposed to
recept this reply as satisfactory.
The Japenese dovertinent in reply to the enquiry
nddrenged to them, stated that while they refused to
rucognize the D-cengity of the Chinose Minister's counter-
signature, they regulated, the export of arms to China in
accordance with the "evlood Tulus of 1908 concerning the
"Iaportation of Arne and amunition", and with "Article 3
"of the regulations attached to the Revised Chine Import
"Tariff of 1999". The Jopencse Government, therefore,
appear to require a "huchoo" issued by the Chinese Centrel
Government before granting a licence for the export of orns
to China. I should be glad to learn whether a reply in
thin senge was returned to the French Government's enquiry,
and, if so, whether ". Cambon's remark that it vaa
unsatisfactory indiested a doaire on the part of the Prench
Government that further steps should be taken in this
connexion. on this point I would observe that since Japan'a
shore of the Chian cras mentes ia abnted to have amounted
in
to but E of the total in 1935, Japenese aras manufacturers
would not prour to have benefited greatly at the expense
of their competitors by the refusal of the Japanese
Government to require the Chinese Minister's counter-signature.
46
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.